Christopher Blizzard wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 14:05 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
*shrug* I'll give this a +1. Although if discussion goes to
'fedora-devel'
one wonders what the usefulness of fedora-maintainers will start to
be?
Yeah, I don't get this. fedora-maintainers is pretty useful - high
signal, low crap. The proper reaction to things like this is almost
never _another_ mailing list.
It is pretty useful if you have the time to follow all the posts and
read everything. It is wrong-minded however to expect everyone with
lesser commitments to be able to read and follow everything on a busy
discussion list. For them, they could opt to follow minimally
fedora-devel-announce.
I'm half-decided on if fedora-devel-announce then kill
fedora-maintainers. fedora-maintainers has the benefit of having a
significantly better signal to noise ratio than fedora-devel-list.
There is however a detriment to the redundancy.
If folks were willing to be more MILITANT AND CONSISTENT in enforcing
the "devel only" rules for fedora-devel-list I might be happier about
killing fedora-maintainers. But consistent enforcement has proven to be
impossible to maintain in the past.
We should talk about this issues in tomorrow's FESCO meeting.
Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
