On 05/06/07, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Oh, that's touchy subject. Not because of CentOS and SL, but because RHEL is all but self-hosting. Some parts have been taken from FC6 (~15%), so they have been built in some FC6 environment, others from not anymore existing gcc compilers (or internal ones). I talked to CentOS last week and there are cases where the CentOS kernel oopses, when the RHEL one doesn't and vice-versa. So RHEL and clones are a bad example when it comes to talking about (re)builds. I think Fedora can do far better than this.
Quite - in this case it seems to me that CentOS did things "right" and did the full rebuild that RHEL should have had. Isn't this a really convincing argument for full rebuild testing of Fedora? -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
