On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 19:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Brian Pepple wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 14:42 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:08:23AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > >>> /topic RELENG-Meeting - Freeze Policy - JesseKeating > >> I would suggest to consider at least one full rebuild [1] before the > >> final freeze (e.g. as part of the pre-freeze process) and of course to > >> allow for enough time between the freeze and the GA to shake out any > >> bugs that will surface by that process. > > > > This is on FESCo's schedule to discuss after F7 was released. > > Note that this has caused mass confusion as I thought it would. It is > not just about technical requirements. > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2007-June/msg00048.html > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2007-June/msg01017.html > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-June/msg00016.html Wasn't it the case that most of these folks didn't read the release notes? > > Another reason to consider doing rebuilds > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-May/msg01171.html Did we ever get a list of the packages that were actually effected by this? /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
