On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:40:26AM -0400, Jeff Sheltren wrote: > Luke, thanks for all your work on Bodhi! > > Does anyone have an answer to the question at the bottom of the Bodhi wiki > page: > - Are we going to have any rule for how long things should be in > updates-testing? How much QA? How many good/bad? > > Was this already discussed somewhere? :) Not that I know of. Once we agree on a policy, I can implement it. I've heard some people suggest letting updates sit in testing for 7 days, and if there are no complaints, then they can be pushed to the stable repo. This sounds fine to me, what does everyone else think? We'll have a better feedback interface in place in the near future, where testers can +1/-1 updates. From here, we can say that n positive approvals will mark an update as stable. What should n be? > Also, it looks like I can revoke/edit push requests. Is that intended > behavior? Jesse, I clicked on the revoke link for your pungi package and it > seemed to successfully revoke the push request. I clicked the link to push > it again, so it should be back to normal (awaiting push), but please verify! Bodhi is very trusting at the moment. I hacked in some basic access control last night, and plan on improving it soon. Until we can acquire the maintainers of a package, bodhi will only allow modifications from the initial submitter. luke -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
