On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 01:20:30PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 06:38 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:07:36AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:11 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > >> On Thursday 31 May 2007 10:58:31 Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > >>> Is it an enhancement, or a bugfix, or neither?
> > > >> Enhancement (to the distribution)
> > > > It would be easier if the update was a bit clever about new packages,
> > > > and made them bypass updates-testing automatically.
> > >
> > > +1
> >
> > Just because it's a new package means it doesn't need to be tested? :)
> No, because pushing packages into "testing" makes sense when chasing
> specific bugs ("does this version fix kernel bug XYZ") or in case of
> very complex packages (such as the kernel).
It also makes sense in attempting to sustain a stable distribution and
cultivate a team of community testers.
luke
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
