Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 20:52 +0200, Axel Thimm a écrit : > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 07:08:09PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 11:18 -0500, Josh Boyer a écrit : > > > On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 09:02 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote: > > > > > > > > * a "make push" command that could be run to push a package w/o any > > > > manual intervention. For most packages, a "make tag build push" would > > > > suffice, and the world wouldn't come to an end. > > > > > > That should never happen for updates. Packages are signed and you need > > > a human to sign them. Automating the signing process is absurd because > > > if that's done, there is no point in signing things anyway. > > > > Of course there is. > > > [...] > > I was just going to write what Nicolas did. In fact even to the > letter. Maybe we are twin brothers after all and our parents lied to > us ;) Oh, no, I'm Axelefying! /me checks the water tap for radioactive elements :) > Anyway to add something to the discussion: ATrpms does automated > signing since the beginning And kernel.org autosigns too. Anyone wants to pretend that system has not been audited to death? -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
