Updates System

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Possibly, because RH once again seems to have failed to communicate what
THEIR plan is and seems to be pressing something which doesn't seem to
be clear to themselves onto the community.

At the moment I am primarily referring to this nonsensical regressions
this new release flow and koji impose on my packages. I see regressions
all over the place: What once was simple, now requires additional effort
and wastes my time.

Ralf

Ralf,

You are going way overboard in escalating what is entirely a non-issue.

All package updates going out after F7 release will need to go through the update system. Pushing packages in this way is NOT a horrible burden that you make it out to be. This is only formalizing a process that was very uncontrolled in the past only because we didn't have time to write anything like this.

Fact of the matter is, we were doing poorly in Fedora in the past without package update announcements for Extras. Sure, this was harmless in most cases, but in the case of security this was quite possibly dangerous and not in the interest of spreading necessary awareness to our community.

Today Core updates happen using this update system. It is a smooth and formal process.

1) Maintainer checks changes into CVS branch.
2) Maintainer builds.
3) Maintainer tests that build.
4) Maintainer fills out the form with the N-V-R, optional security (yes/no), optional Bug numbers fixed, and some fills in some details of what the update is about, then chooses updates or updates-testing.
5) Submit, where security and/or rel-eng team pushes it through.

I personally don't care what the update announcement part says. If you truly have nothing meaningful to say about it, I personally don't care if you write:
- Update to new version
- Updating because I feel like it
- Bump

Bodhi really isn't that bad currently, and I suspect we will make further improvements down the line to more smoothly integrate it into other parts of the package process. If there is enough demand, we might even be able to write an optional TUI interface to accommodate users who want to avoid a web driven push process.

This is necessary and we are going to do it. I believe after working out some initial kinks, participants will realize how much it really doesn't suck.

However, if you don't wish to participate then you are free to leave.

Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux