Re: Broken upgrade paths in F7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 15 May 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 08:43 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
We've been over this before Ralf.  Things change.  It's not a
regression, it's a change in workflow.

It's an undocumented insane regression in workflow  and a mistake of
release engineering - IMO, it's yet another case of RH having out-ruling
a once functional practice and replaced it with something not helpful to
external contributors.

 Not helpful to external contributors?  Let me pick that claim apart.

1. Us external contributors can now sign up to work on former-Core packages.

2. Former-Core packages can now BR/link against former-Extras packages.

3. Things are no longer hidden behind Red Hat's internal, at-least-somewhat-proprietary buildsystem. Everything's in the open.

4. I know at least one non-employee of Red Hat works on improving and managing Koji (i.e., this isn't part of the Grand Red Hat Conspiracy).

5. The development freezes have been done before, they just were enforced quite poorly in Extras. Downside: More restrictions for former-Extras. Upside: Extras packages are no longer "second-class citizens."

 Need I continue?

     Jima

(also a non-RH employee)

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux