Brian Pepple schrieb: > /topic FESCO-Meeting -- MISC -- EPEL Reporting - > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-April/msg00713.html My suggestion for this topic can be found at https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-May/msg00067.html > /topic FESCO-Meeting -- EPEL? Summary from last weeks meeting: https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-May/msg00010.html Happenings during the past week: * Axel steps down from epel; see https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-May/msg00019.html The Steering Committee will look for a successor. * Rebuild for RHEL5 finished; I'll send a "Fedora contributors, if you want to build for EPEL start now mail" with a FAQ over the next few days to this list, as some contributors are waiting for such a mail. But the repo is open for building already, so if Fedora Contributors want to start they are free to do so. But I'll put some more infos into my mail to * I still would like to have some feedback (not more for now) from FESCo members regarding the repotag issue (see https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-April/msg01232.html ); we discussed it yesterday again in the EPEL Steering Committee meeting, but are still evaluating what to do; looks like some people consider to continue as planed -- e.g. go without them. What do FESCo members think about this topic? FESCo itself voted months ago to go without repotags. CU thl -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
