On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 10:41 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 09:07 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 10:51 +0200, Christian Iseli wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > > > On Wed, 09 May 2007 17:05:05 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > > > > Anyway, please find below the list of > > > > topics that are likely to come up in the next FESCo meeting that is > > > > scheduled for tomorrow, Thursday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on > > > > irc.freenode.org: > > > > > > I won't be able to attend: I have voluntary firefighter training that I > > > need to attend... > > > > > > In case the zope thing comes up again, here is my current view: > > > - I'm not in favor of a compat-python2.4 package: > > > o python maintainer doesn't want it > > > o not in line with a bleeding edge distro > > > o does not encourage other packages to update to newer version > > > - I could agree to a runzope package, or maybe even better a > > > zope-runtime sub-package > > > > Since I probably won't be there, due to the RH Summit, my thoughts (and > > votes if it comes to it): > > > > - No compat-python2.4 package > > Spot, could you clarify this a bit? Christian stated his opinion on > both compat-python2.4 (a generic compat package for the distro) and > "runzope" (python 2.4 packaged inside of the zope package). I'm not against runzope, per-se, but I'd much much rather see an effort to bring zope to current python. My biggest concern with runzope packaging ideaology is that we'll leave it at that, and not fix the real problem. ~spot -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
