On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:42:20 +0200 "Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski" wrote: > > You're talking multiarch again. We don't want to have both 32bit > and 64bit binaries installed! I know diskspace is cheap, but the user > doesn't need two binaries for each application. > > You install either 32bit or 64bit version and use that. Why switch > at all? Sometimes folks *do* want both. And who are you to dictate that everyone else must install just one or just the other globally? What if, on a multi-user system, USER_A wants firefox.i386 and USER_B wants firefox.x86_64 ? There are no technical reasons why it can't be done so why try to impose some artificial (and IMO self-defeating) barriers? Ed -- Edward H. Hill III, PhD | ed@xxxxxxx | http://eh3.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
