Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 19:16 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> God, I hate it when people trim away the important parts. Aow you
> assume again your model of "review everything once again, we'll split
> off all bins by F10-F11", but I'm still in this year, and want Fedora
> to do something more then rereviewing all its specfiles several times
> a year. 

Ah, I see.

So for the sake of sanity, I shall just pretend that when I asked for
clarification by quoting "punched install/remove holes?" when you
claimed they were "firmly embedded in the multilib design", your
response was as follows:

-> > 'punched install/remove holes'?
-> 
-> No, I misspoke. Those, along with the 'rpm special handling' of which
-> I spoke, are not firmly embedded in the multilib design; they were
-> just another problem created by another bad short-term decision, as
-> you said. 

-- 
dwmw2

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux