On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:41 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 4/16/07, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Probably the former. Please post the license text, or throw the bugzilla > > number at me. > > pigment ticket: 233597 > elisa ticket: 233598 > > both have the same additional clause. The text of the additional clause is: > > Fluendo hereby grants permission for anyone under a valid license distributing > Fluendo's non-GPL compatible GStreamer plugins to distribute and use them > together with GStreamer and Elisa. This permission is above and beyond the > permissions granted by the GPL license by which Elisa is covered. If you > modify this code, you may extend this permission to your version of the code, > but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this > exception statement from your version. > > > Like I said this looks fine to me, but I hadn't run across an > exceptions situation yet in a review. So pigment and elisa don't use _any_ other GPLed code that is not owned by themselves (libraries?) ? Simo. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
