Re: Question on how to handled "GPL with exceptions" in a package review.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/16/07, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Probably the former. Please post the license text, or throw the bugzilla
number at me.

pigment ticket: 233597
elisa ticket: 233598

both have the same additional clause.  The text of the additional clause is:

Fluendo hereby grants permission for anyone under a valid license distributing
Fluendo's non-GPL compatible GStreamer plugins to distribute and use them
together with GStreamer and Elisa. This permission is above and beyond the
permissions granted by the GPL license by which Elisa is covered. If you
modify this code, you may extend this permission to your version of the code,
but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this
exception statement from your version.


Like I said this looks fine to me, but I hadn't run across an
exceptions situation yet in a review.

-jef

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux