Le Mar 17 avril 2007 06:58, Tom Lane a écrit : > For a hypothetical non-GPL plugin X, it would > be up to X's owner to say "yeah, you can distribute this with GStreamer > all you want, even though it's not GPL". Wrong. the hypothetical non-GPL plugin owner would have to prove even though it's digging deeply within gstreamer insternals it's not a gstreamer derivative and the GPL does not apply to the pluggin code What fluendo did is grant itself the permission to release and have distributed derivative code not bound by the gstreamer license (because FLOSS obligations are incompatible with the video patent regimes out there) -- Nicolas Mailhot -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
