On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 12:40 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > On 05.04.2007 04:45, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>>>> "RS" == Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> RS> Do consider adding Packaging Conflicts to the topics. > >> Also note http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Conflicts > >> Discussion in the last PC meeting in January > >> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/IRCLog20070130) indicates > >> that this draft was approved by PC and FESCo. I am not sure why I > >> can't seem to find it in the guidelines. > > > > I asked that two or three times in the past, too, without getting a > > reply :-( > > > > Further: Having a guideline doesn't solve the problem. Someone needs to > > enforce it. And that's FESCo's job afaics. > > We also need to determine the approach to resolve conflicts for existing > packages in the repository. Does a small team do it? Do we file bug reports? I would think bug reports should be filed irregardless of who will be doing the fixing. It provides some kind of tracking and launch pad for cleanup. josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
