Re: Proposal: Automate fedora-maintainers subscriptions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher Stone schrieb:
> On 3/20/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Why does games SIG require a separate mailing list?
> For the same reason any SIG should have their own list.

And that reason is?

CU
thl

P.S..:In case it matters: my current opinion is that this list is fine
to stay, but seems some people think different about it and I agree that
it's worth to be discussed

P.P.S.:I just want to make sure we have a healthy information flow in
the project as a whole. Having separate communication channels sometimes
can improve the "information flow" but sometimes disturb it. It's a
trade off.

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux