On Mar 14, 2007, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 03:08 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Mar 9, 2007, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 05:27 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> >> it's not enough for you to be allowed to distribute the program >> >> without a copy of the GPL, because the GPL itself requires it to >> >> be included. > What are legal implications on rpm packagers when they add legal > files? If it adds something that the copyright holder demanded everyone who distributes the program to add, you can't get it wrong as far as the copyright holder is concerned, methinks. But IANAL ;-) -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
