Hi, all. I have a question about the legal status of a package I'm working on. I'm nearly done with writing a nice package of Tavis Ormandy's scanmem utility [1]. However, it contains no full license text, and the headers in the source files only contain author/version informations. The only reference to a license aside from what's on the website is that the README file (which I include as %doc) contains the following line: License: GPL Is this reference enough, or should I also include a full copy of the GPL as %doc as well? (If so, I'll email Tavis and bug him about including it in the tarball.) Thanks. [1] http://taviso.decsystem.org/scanmem.html -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF Associate Member #5015 GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ About: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PeterGordon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
