On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 05:27 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Mar 7, 2007, Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > However, it contains no full license text, and the headers in the > > source files only contain author/version informations. The only > > reference to a license aside from what's on the website is that the > > README file (which I include as %doc) contains the following line: > > > License: GPL > > > Is this reference enough, > > IANAL. It's enough for you to tell that you can use any version of > the GPL, but it's not enough for you to be allowed to distribute the > program without a copy of the GPL, because the GPL itself requires it > to be included. IANAL, IMO, this is an upstream-issue, because it's legally irrelevant/legally not bind to _upstream_ whether a packager adds a copy of the GPL or not. Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
