On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:05:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Or we just throw out the non-gui emacs and only ship the one that can do both > > +1. Building emacs without X support was pretty pointless a dozen years > ago, and it is far more so now. What other packages do we build > multiple versions of to avoid pulling in dependencies? There is also vim. I guess it is not exactly the same split, but it seems to be split to keep a minimal vim-minimal. In my opinion it would be right to build 2 versions of all the packages that have a console version and a X version to minimize deps for the console version, such that it may be installed on X-less computers. It is really not pointless, I don't install X and even less gtk on some servers, and I may want emacs (now I use vi, but I used emacs in the past ;-). This is not going to be a lot of packages anyway. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
