On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 15:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:28:46PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > It only > > > solves a few rare use cases and it's causing real problems. > > If you call "rare use cases" every server that didn't snatch a sub-100 > > uid while there where some room left > > To be clear, I'm only in favor of getting rid of it if some other way of > rationally assigning fixed user ids is phased in. Sorry to jump in in the middle of the discussion, but I really don't get why you should have fixed uids. Sure 1-100 is a too tiny space, Fedora should probably begin to reserve 1-1000 or maybe 1-10000 for "system/packages" uids. You can't fix the size problem switching from dynamic to fixed uids so I don't see the point. Simo. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
