Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
I disagree. The problem afaics (correct me if I'm wrong) is only solved
if the packager is a sponsor. But we should solve the problem also for
non-sponsors, so a normal and experienced packager (I'd roughly say this
means all of the packagers we currently have that are around for more
then 3 months and have at least two packages) that are not yet sponsors
should be able to get upstream involved easily, too.
In other words: FD0 should gets access to some packages only, no access
to the buildsystem to prevent that stuff get build and pushed out.
Members of FD2 (e.g. packagers that are around for some time and got a
bit experience) could approve members for FD0 (for example upstream or
new packagers) and give them access to their packages. But FD2 members
should still not be able to upgrade people to FD1 (that should still
require a proper sponsor).
CU
thl
Interesting, I had not considered the possibility that members lower
than sponsor (FD5) could bring FD0 onboard. This might work.
Warren
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
