On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:18:43 -0500 jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx (Jesse Keating) wrote: > On Monday 12 February 2007 17:09, Warren Togami wrote: > > FESCO Members, I would like this process to be ratified in order to > > get rid of CVSSyncNeeded. If you think the process below should be > > adjusted before ratification, please reply with comments. This has > > NOTHING to do with the review process which must be fixed > > independently. > > I'll give this a +1, and hopefully we'll revisit when packageDB and > such become realities and we can give people more access to things > like creating their own co-maintainers and such. Ditto... +1 to this process for now, and hopefully we can look again once we have the package database and such in place. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
