On Monday 12 February 2007 17:09, Warren Togami wrote: > FESCO Members, I would like this process to be ratified in order to get > rid of CVSSyncNeeded. If you think the process below should be adjusted > before ratification, please reply with comments. This has NOTHING to do > with the review process which must be fixed independently. I'll give this a +1, and hopefully we'll revisit when packageDB and such become realities and we can give people more access to things like creating their own co-maintainers and such. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpl3enBDpVh9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
