Steve Grubb wrote:
On Friday 09 February 2007 08:53, Patrice Dumas wrote:
What about the rotated files?
If you know their exact names ..., why not also %ghost them?
The local admin could have made changes to the logrotate rules.
Right, that was my point in mentioning rotated logs. The admin could have set
the number of kept logs to 20. So, the question is why should 1 file be
ghosted when you have this open ended rotate question?
Thats a real good point. No package pwning^H^H^H^H^H^H owning any
logfiles in /var/log/ sounds more and more reasonable. Directories there
are a different matter as they clearly are connected to a specific package.
Read ya, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Development | Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch <phil@xxxxxxxxx>
Hauptstaetterstr. 58 | Web: http://www.redhat.de/
D-70178 Stuttgart
Motd: You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
