On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:11 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 08.02.2007 14:28, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:26:51AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> On Thursday 08 February 2007 02:56, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> Who gets to decide on what the final procedure will be. Currently the > >>> decission making process is very unclear. Thus FESCO get to vote on > >>> this, or some other committee? > >> I'm all for FESCO making this decision. > > That's fine, > > /me agrees that it's a decision for FESCo > > /me at the same time really wonders why the wiki document where this > needs to be integrated is protected by restricting ACLs of the Packaging > Committee > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > That would indicate that it would be stuff for the Packaging Committee. > But they want to concentrate around Packaging, and not Policies or > Review stuff afaik More appropriate, IMHO, is to break out the part of that document which describes the review process and put it outside the Packaging/ section. Then, that document can simply point to the review process, say, wiki/ReviewProcess . ~spot -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
