Re: ACL's, Why a Big Deal?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Warren Togami wrote:
2) For newly added packages, pkg.acl exists by default. If you as an owner don't want such protectionism, just cvs remove it.

My opinion is, at least the sponsor of the person who maintains
the package should have the right to access the package by default.

Then: is the idea that to creating a rather big group including
sponsors, cvs admin, etc... and to give some more free access right
for the people in the group (I remember someone proposed before)
is gone away?

Mamoru


--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux