On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:29:08PM -0800, Christopher Stone wrote: > On 2/6/07, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:04:07AM -0800, Christopher Stone wrote: > >> > >> 1) php-pear has a major upgrade (1.5.0) and the current version is > >> 1.4.11 in cvs. The 1.5.0 upgrade is going to bring on significant > >> changes. I am asking him to make these significant changes _before_ I > >> do a formal review. However, he insists that I must do my review on > >> the version that is currently in CVS. > > > >You need to review what he intends to put in F7. If that's not 1.5.0, then > >oh well. Asking someone to do a major upgrade just for you to review it > >is silly. Especially given that we're driving towards a test2 release! > > F7 will have 1.5.0 I find that very odd. Jesse, any comments on this from a releng point? > >If they are only _suggested_ changes, and not _required_ changes, then he > >doesn't have to change. Period. As a review, you can suggest so but when > >someone says no, then drop it. > > rpmlint suggested it be fixed, and I even verified it with a packaging > committee member and he too suggested it be fixed in the spec. > > What am I to do? override both what rpmlint and PC memebers are > telling me? Joe's refusal to fix this after both rpmlint and f13 > suggested he fix it basically forces me to bring the issue up here. I > do not have the authority to override both the packaging committee and > rpmlint. It's not required. Just move on with life and log it in the bug. It's not something to hold a review up on. josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
