On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 07:48 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 21:58 +0000, jpo wrote: > >> On 2007/02/04, at 16:35, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 17:59 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> 2) Are Core packages under review allowed to have build and > >>>> install time > >>>> dependencies to packages in Extras nowadays or (still) not? > >>> > >>> I think yes, since post-merge, there will be no difference. > >> > >> I don't think so. Apparently perl-HTML-Tagset failed to build with an > >> Extras' > >> build requirement (perl-Test-Pod). > >> > >> > >> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226261 > > > > We're not merged yet. :) > > Arg, stupid question, what if say, someone were wanting to Review some > previously Core package, that now would want/need new Extras' dependencies? > OK, review wouldn't be much of a problem (reviewers likely could figure > that out), but building after-the-fact would be. (?) > > Any hints/timetable when/if this can be fixed/resolved? I realize this is > kind of a chicken-and-egg problem, but it's an important one. Well, review is all about existing packages, not about possible future changes. I don't think it is a good idea to mix the two. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
