Re: Co-maintainersip policy for Fedora Packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



seth vidal wrote:
Comaintainership - an alternate policy suggestion:

1. two(or more) people maintain the package
2. they talk to each other if there is a conflict
3. if there is a big conflict and they can't work it out, they talk to
fesco for resolution
4. no more rules after this are needed


Seriously - why not just make it simple and have all other things
resolved like we would resolve normal conflicts?

Why all the overhead of rules early?

-sv


+1,

Me like KISS too.

Regards,

Hans

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux