On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 17:59 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > === Disputes === > [...] I don't know what is it, but this part makes me worry to some degree. It looks like too much bureaucracy, and the challenge-from-within thing is rather scary, and may make some maintainers choose polite and accepting co-maintainers instead of competent ones (although these attributes are not mutually exclusive, the limited choice makes that kind of decisions unavoidable sometimes). I also tend to think that the suggested mechanism will push us toward a democracy to some degree instead of a meritocracy. I guess I should bite the bullet and say it: The bureaucracy looks too much like Debian to me. I quite like other parts of the proposal, and the only other part that makes me worry a little is the three-maintainers-per-package part. I can't say much about other packages, with the kind of packages that I am/was involved in maintaining, two is usually quite enough. Three or more maintainers will only make things more complicated. Roozbeh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
