Re: Extras Buildsys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:53:47 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

> > Yeah, that leaves us with in extras: 
> > 
> > andreas.bierfert AT lowlatency.de:
> >     wine-docs
> >       FE3 > FE4 (0:0.9.27-1.fc3 > 0:0.9.24-1.fc4)
> > 
> This is held up on this bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179852
> 
> wine-docs on FC-4 is out of sync with the other wine packages as well:
> The wine-docs rpm from FC-3 is actually a better match for the FC-4 wine
> than the older wine-docs.

I've fixed that by copying FC-3 wine-docs to FC-4. It's noarch.

The buildsys has failed to build wine-docs for FC-4 for a long time (above
bug), and only a work-around managed to get it built until a new build
problem turnt up recently.

It is not worth doing anything else in this matter. Well, unless the
problem returns for a target > FC-4 or RHEL.



FE-3 and FE-4 have been pruned to just the latest package release. Only in
FE-3 there are six packages from pre-"Fedora Extras 3" which differ in
%release for i386 and x86_64 because of manual builds, and hence there
are two srpms for them.

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux