On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:53:47 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > Yeah, that leaves us with in extras: > > > > andreas.bierfert AT lowlatency.de: > > wine-docs > > FE3 > FE4 (0:0.9.27-1.fc3 > 0:0.9.24-1.fc4) > > > This is held up on this bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179852 > > wine-docs on FC-4 is out of sync with the other wine packages as well: > The wine-docs rpm from FC-3 is actually a better match for the FC-4 wine > than the older wine-docs. I've fixed that by copying FC-3 wine-docs to FC-4. It's noarch. The buildsys has failed to build wine-docs for FC-4 for a long time (above bug), and only a work-around managed to get it built until a new build problem turnt up recently. It is not worth doing anything else in this matter. Well, unless the problem returns for a target > FC-4 or RHEL. FE-3 and FE-4 have been pruned to just the latest package release. Only in FE-3 there are six packages from pre-"Fedora Extras 3" which differ in %release for i386 and x86_64 because of manual builds, and hence there are two srpms for them. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
