On 01 Jan 2007 12:58:50 -0600
tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx (Jason L Tibbitts III) wrote:
> >>>>> "DG" == Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> DG> Just a note to all, the buildsys no longer accepts jobs for Extras
> DG> for FC-3 and FC-4
>
> Since that's the case, perhaps we could trim FC3 and FC4 from the EVR
> problem report. There now seems to be no possibility of fixing those
> issues.
Yeah, that leaves us with in extras:
andreas.bierfert AT lowlatency.de:
wine-docs
FE3 > FE4 (0:0.9.27-1.fc3 > 0:0.9.24-1.fc4)
In core there is:
device-mapper
FC4-updates > FC5 (0:1.02.07-2.0 > 0:1.02.02-3.2)
lvm2
FC4-updates > FC5 (0:2.02.06-1.0.fc4 > 0:2.02.01-1.2.1)
mozilla
FL3-updates > FC4-updates (37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy >
37:1.7.13-1.1.fc4) FL3-updates > FC5-updates (37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy >
37:1.7.13-1.1.fc5)
xen
FC5-updates > FC6-updates (0:3.0.3-2.fc5 > 0:3.0.3-1.fc6)
>
> I think we got all of the FC3 and FC4 broken rep's fixed, so there
> shouldn't be problems with that report.
Yeah, none there that I know of.
>
> - J<
Two other end of life issues someone needs to address:
- Is someone going to close all the legacy/FE/FC <5 bugs in bugzilla?
Looks like there are 77 or so for fe3/fe4.
Around 841 in fc1/fc2/fc3/fc4
Around 107 in legacy.
- I seem to remember that the infrastructure team was for some reason
using some fc/fe3 packages on the builders or other infrastructure
machines. Can we make sure those get branched/maintained for epel and
any machines switched to those new packages?
kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
