On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:53:47 -0800 a.badger@xxxxxxxxx (Toshio Kuratomi) wrote: > > > > Two other end of life issues someone needs to address: > > > > - Is someone going to close all the legacy/FE/FC <5 bugs in > > bugzilla? > > > > Looks like there are 77 or so for fe3/fe4. > > Around 841 in fc1/fc2/fc3/fc4 > > Around 107 in legacy. > > > IMHO, it would be best if the package maintainer does this. Look at > the open bugs on your packages. Decide whether to push them forward, > close them, or mark them NEEDINFO so that the bug reporter has the > opportunity to push them forward (like Davej's treatment of kernel > bugs.) I suspect that many people won't do so for whatever reason, and we will be left with bugs where people expect responses and never get them. Thats just not good IMHO. I think someone doing a blanket 'This release is no longer supported, can you retest with fc6 and re-file if it is still an issue' and closing the bug would be better. All just my opinion. ;) Also, can someone disable reporting new bugs against those older releases? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
