On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 11:19 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > I'd be more in favor of a > rule that just says "items checked need to be listed out in the review before > building of the package will be allowed". Vague enough as to not give > reviewers a shortcut. That sounds fine to me. The problem I had was reviewers just putting 'APPROVED' in reviews, and not giving any information on what was actually checked. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
