Re: Summary from yesterdays (mini) FESCo meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 11:19 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> I'd be more in favor of a 
> rule that just says "items checked need to be listed out in the review before 
> building of the package will be allowed".  Vague enough as to not give 
> reviewers a shortcut.

That sounds fine to me.  The problem I had was reviewers just putting
'APPROVED' in reviews, and not giving any information on what was
actually checked.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux