Re: Summary from yesterdays (mini) FESCo meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 29 December 2006 11:32, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> So, you should just copy and paste all of the guidelines into the
> review? :-)  Because the fact that the package follows the guidelines is
> what is supposed to be checked, not just some subset.
>
> A much better check and balance is exactly what happened in this case;
> dgilmore saw something suspicious and held off on the branch request.
> The next step would be either just doing just sort of a quick review or
> asking someone else to do a quick pass with such a review... such random
> and spot checks of reviews will go a long way towards verification.

Sure, that's best of all.  I didn't make that clear in my message.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgp2uOe0zWAeW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux