On Friday 29 December 2006 09:00, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > The decision went towards a proposed new rule: "the reviewer has to at > least mention that he checked the license, if the sources match upstream > and 5 other points he checked when approving a package". Dgilmore will > post to f-e-l about this whole thing in more detail and start a public > discussion before FESCo discusses this further. hrm, you must wear at least 5 pieces of flair... Seriously, a rule like this just encourages folks to check 5 things only and move on. If rules were set in place to make 5 specific things mandatory, that's all that will be checked. Lets not give reviewers a shortcut out. I'd be more in favor of a rule that just says "items checked need to be listed out in the review before building of the package will be allowed". Vague enough as to not give reviewers a shortcut. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpAsqrTzHTgd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
