Jason L Tibbitts III (tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > BN> You seriously want a script to be handling per-transaction state > BN> of the updater that's running it? That sounds like a very wrong > BN> solution. > > Well, If you can point out where I said that, I'll surely correct > myself because that certainly wasn't what I intended. Matthias mentioned how this doesn't solve the 'regenerates the cache many many times' issue, and you stated that 'the xdg script could solve that.' Bill -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
