Jason L Tibbitts III (tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > MC> It is interesting to note that this proposal doesn't actually > MC> address the one problem that there is with the current snipplets, > MC> namely that we keep regenerating the cache over and over. > > Well, the xdg script could do that. We certainly shouldn't push such > logic into the scriptlets of every package. You seriously want a script to be handling per-transaction state of the updater that's running it? That sounds like a very wrong solution. Bill -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
