Rex Dieter (rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > Main problem *this* proposal is (trying to) address: > The freedesktop.org icon spec only mandates 'touching' top-level icon > dir, but current packaging guidelines include toolkit-specific (gtk2) > cache implementation details. Removing those details without addressing > related gtk2 RFE yields stale gtk2 icon cache. > > I proposed keeping the exising gtk-update-icon-cache as an option for > icon scriptlets, and this was universally shot-down by the PC. They > insisted on simplicity. > > So, this led to option 2: > Propose using only xdg-utils. This simplifies the guidelines, uses > desktop-agnostic tools, and (virtually) fixes the gtk2 issue, since it > guarantees that the gtk2 icon cache is (should be!) kept current. But this doesn't 'solve' anything, or 'simiplify' anything - it just moves a touch into the shell script, and renames the command, and makes things slower. So, essentially, it boils down to an objection to the tool being named 'gtk2-...'? Bill -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
