Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-12-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

NM> I wonder how you think you'll get any rawhide testers if
NM> maintainers are encouraged to let rawhide bitrot till test1.

I'm sorry, I fail to notice where anyone was encouraging anyone to let
rawhide bitrot.  I also fail to see where I said that the reports
should be suppressed until test1 is released.

Are you simply trying to be offensively argumentative?  If not,
perhaps you could elide the hyperbole and address my suggestion in an
intelligent and reasoned manner.  Thank you.

 - J<

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux