Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-12-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le samedi 02 décembre 2006 à 11:00 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
> >Axel.Thimm AT ATrpms.net:
> >    smart
> >      FE4 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc4 > 0:0.42-39.fc6)
> >      FE5 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc5 > 0:0.42-39.fc6)
> >      FE6 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc6 > 0:0.42-39.fc6)
> 
> I wonder if it would be reasonable to suppress rawhide in this report
> until we get closer to test time.  Since rawhide occasionally doesn't
> build, and maintainers often concentrate on released versions when
> fixing important bugs or pushing security fixes, the information often
> isn't pertinent.

I wonder how you think you'll get any rawhide testers if maintainers are
encouraged to let rawhide bitrot till test1.

Also, I wonder how many people will dare test test1 if no one ran devel
before.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux