On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 11:00 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >Axel.Thimm AT ATrpms.net: > > smart > > FE4 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc4 > 0:0.42-39.fc6) > > FE5 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc5 > 0:0.42-39.fc6) > > FE6 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc6 > 0:0.42-39.fc6) > > I wonder if it would be reasonable to suppress rawhide in this report > until we get closer to test time. Since rawhide occasionally doesn't > build, and maintainers often concentrate on released versions when > fixing important bugs or pushing security fixes, the information often > isn't pertinent. I think suppressing the Rawhide stuff would be quite harmful. Most people tend to test rawhide by installing the latest release, then upgrading from there. However, if the EVR for an FC6 package is greater than that of the corresponding FC7/devel package (or FC7 greater than FC8/devel, et al.), then that package will not be upgraded and the person is not fully testing a rawhide install (especially when some stuff is rawhide-only and mixing stable and rawhide versions of things can cause major breakage). -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
