On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 12:21 -0600, Jima wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Actually I am only arguing with one party "Fedora Leadership", > > on always the same subject "Their (IMO narrow-minded) notion on > > OpenSource". > > Okay. In that case, when the next election comes around, nominate > yourself. If you find yourself constantly at odds with so-called "Fedora > Leadership," then take a stand and try to become part of the solution. ATM, I am not interested in getting involved into FESCo, primarily for 2 reasons: 1) All spare time I have available for Fedora already is allocated by other Fedora activities. 2) FESCo isn't necessarily interesting to me. I perceive it more as a "FE administration bureau" but a democratically elected "community parliament" or "FE government" or as the "organ representing the community in Fedora". > Remember, Fedora is largely self-governed. Well, I am having doubts on this claim/statement. FE definitely to some extend is "self-administrated", but I don't see a "self-governed Fedora". Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
