On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:31:52PM -0700, Garrick Staples alleged: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:03:25AM +0200, Axel Thimm alleged: > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:41:07PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 17:20 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > > > > Just FYI, > > > > > > > > I have filed over 110+ bugs against ATrpms for conflicts against FC/FE > > > > repositories. The tracker bug is here: > > > > > > > > http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1028 > > > > > > > > Let's hope some good becomes of this. > > > > > > I hope this is a step in the right direction. Thank you for getting > > > back to a technical solution. > > > > Drowning bugzilla.atrpms.net in a pile of *empty* [1] bug reports > > against non-broken packages a technical solution? That's more like > > spamming and stalking. I'm trying to get people to use > > bugzilla.atrpms.net, now it's a dump. > > Would you like help going through them? I went through the first dozen or so, researching the differences between the FE and ATrpms packages by reading the spec files. Most of them seem OK to retire from ATrpms. I filed a bug against aalib to get ncurses support. Some I'm clearly not qualified to judge (like bugzilla and clamav) since those are big packages that I don't use. If you are OK with this, I'll go through some more tomorrow. -- Garrick Staples, Linux/HPCC Administrator University of Southern California
Attachment:
pgpml5cGeuNnT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
