On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:41:07PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 17:20 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > > Just FYI, > > > > I have filed over 110+ bugs against ATrpms for conflicts against FC/FE > > repositories. The tracker bug is here: > > > > http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1028 > > > > Let's hope some good becomes of this. > > I hope this is a step in the right direction. Thank you for getting > back to a technical solution. Drowning bugzilla.atrpms.net in a pile of *empty* [1] bug reports against non-broken packages a technical solution? That's more like spamming and stalking. I'm trying to get people to use bugzilla.atrpms.net, now it's a dump. Note that spot's suggestion was that "if this is as big of a problem as [Christopher Stone] claims, [he should] start filing bugs if/when things break", not to bugzilla *empty* (!!) reports. I don't like <some other distro>, should I file a bug against all it's packages stating the same text all over again? It's getting more ridicule and awkward by the minute, someone has to stop this, please. [1] They all share the exact same text but the package name, just like a mass legal dissuasion (don't know if that habit exists across the ocean) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgprapUNSKmOi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
