On Wednesday 18 October 2006 11:51, Christopher Stone wrote: > Wow, this bug has already been closed in less than 24 hours as > "WONTFIX" from someone who apparently does not want to even hear any > discussion on this. > > What is the point of filing an RFE if one person who misunderstands or > disagrees with the RFE immediately closes the bug in less than one day > before hearing opinions on the topic? This has been discussed to death in the past. Just because you weren't there doesn't mean it should be discussed again. The upstream author of yum says no. Theoretically you could convince the Fedora maintainer of yum to include and enable the plugin in the Fedora package builds of yum (like we do with fastest mirror and such), but that may be a tough discussion, and may end up just like this bug, given how many times its been discussed in the past before. A user added a repo by whatever means (installed an rpm, copied a file, hand wrote it out). They have a reasonable expectation that the repo they enabled will work just like any other repo they have. To make that the case is just silly. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpdUUZxQxz4C.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
