Re: Agressive FUD by Fedora contributor (was: [Bug 210775])

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/16/06, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 23:51 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
>
> I think that a repository that overrides base packages is far more
> damaging than any comments an individual can make on bugzilla or the
> mailing list.  It is essentially forking Fedora and causes a lot of
> problems for the Fedora community.  Such repositories are essentially
> creating their own distribution and should not be acceptable.  It
> would be better for everyone, in my opinion, if these repositories
> created their own distribution instead.
>
> Therefore, I propose that the 'protectbase' plugin, be actually
> integrated into yum proper, and instead make a plugin which allows
> repositories to override core packages.  That is, the default should
> be that no repository is allowed to override base packages unless you
> specifically install a plugin to allow them to do so.
>
> Comments?

File an RFE in bugzilla.

I have filed an RFE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211250

It was also suggested to me that the 'priorties' plugin would be
"better" for this purpose, see my note about this in the RFE report.

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux