On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:22 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > However, for the case of mono-nunit things are different. I don't think > putting the docs for nunit in a nunit-devel package. That would be > similar to putting the docs for binutils in a binutils-devel package. > (Of course, the binutils package has .h/.so/.a and doc files in the main > package.) Packaging bug - Rarely anybody really needs the *.h/*.a/*.so from binutils. Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
